<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe and the Death of a Brand</title>
	<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/</link>
	<description>Writing about design, the user experience, web technologies, and the latest happenings on our online world.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-982</link>
		<author>Anand</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-982</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm.. I never noticed this before but you are totally right! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ironic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it has to do something with the lack of competition (slightly scary) - I mean if they do start slacking off there are still no alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. I never noticed this before but you are totally right! </p>
<p>Ironic.</p>
<p>Perhaps it has to do something with the lack of competition (slightly scary) - I mean if they do start slacking off there are still no alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tazz</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-503</link>
		<author>Tazz</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First of all, I wonder why Macromedia sold itself.  That it happened, I wonder why Adobe could not keep the products separate.  I agree Adobe site looks mediocre.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same thing with Google and Yahoo taking up smaller companies. Bad trend.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I wonder why Macromedia sold itself.  That it happened, I wonder why Adobe could not keep the products separate.  I agree Adobe site looks mediocre.  </p>
<p>Same thing with Google and Yahoo taking up smaller companies. Bad trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Nichols</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-254</link>
		<author>Ryan Nichols</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good points Kevin. I agree on the release of CS3. Perhaps we'll see the new company emerge at that time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Not to mention my MacBook Pro is CRYING for a universal version of my Adobe apps) :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Kevin. I agree on the release of CS3. Perhaps we&#8217;ll see the new company emerge at that time.</p>
<p>(Not to mention my MacBook Pro is CRYING for a universal version of my Adobe apps) <img src='http://applestooranges.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Cannon</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-253</link>
		<author>Kevin Cannon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I completely disagree. I think the adobe website is a very good representation of the company. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The company is in the middle of a merger and they're fusing the company together. It's a messy experience and it'll take awhile before the new company emerges as a whole and not two parts stuck together.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For that reason, I think the website and product boxes mashups are great. They show the company in the transitioning phase that they're in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I expect a full redesign and effective representation of the brand to happen when Adobe CS3 is launch and all the apps are brought under a single strong Adobe brand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We'll have to wait and see!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I completely disagree. I think the adobe website is a very good representation of the company. </p>
<p>The company is in the middle of a merger and they&#8217;re fusing the company together. It&#8217;s a messy experience and it&#8217;ll take awhile before the new company emerges as a whole and not two parts stuck together.</p>
<p>For that reason, I think the website and product boxes mashups are great. They show the company in the transitioning phase that they&#8217;re in.</p>
<p>I expect a full redesign and effective representation of the brand to happen when Adobe CS3 is launch and all the apps are brought under a single strong Adobe brand.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to wait and see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Nichols</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-251</link>
		<author>Ryan Nichols</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your exactly right Kyle. I added a pic of the 'new' packaging.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your exactly right Kyle. I added a pic of the &#8216;new&#8217; packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Anderson</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-248</link>
		<author>Matthew Anderson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What can I say? I completely agree with you, Ryan. Both sites are extremely lacking in the personality department. It seems as though Adobe.com is trying to stay Adobe-ish, while Adobe Edge is attempting to retain some Macromedia-ness. Neither accomplish what their main goal should be though which is, like you said, appropriately communicating the Adobe experience/relationship back to their users.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say? I completely agree with you, Ryan. Both sites are extremely lacking in the personality department. It seems as though Adobe.com is trying to stay Adobe-ish, while Adobe Edge is attempting to retain some Macromedia-ness. Neither accomplish what their main goal should be though which is, like you said, appropriately communicating the Adobe experience/relationship back to their users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-245</link>
		<author>Kyle</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://applestooranges.com/blog/post/adobe-and-the-death-of-a-brand/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The sad thing -- it isn't relegated to the web; they regurgitation can be seen in the packaging. It's a mashup of the (Chen Design?) clean, colorful Adobe packaging with the boxy, overpowering Macromedia style. Alone, they work. Together, it looks painful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Outside of possible legal issues, I don't understand why companies don't let acquired brands stand on their own (especially strong brands). Nobody says, "Adobe Flash" or "FedEx Kinkos". I chalk it up to insecurity (or dimwits in an echo chamber).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing &#8212; it isn&#8217;t relegated to the web; they regurgitation can be seen in the packaging. It&#8217;s a mashup of the (Chen Design?) clean, colorful Adobe packaging with the boxy, overpowering Macromedia style. Alone, they work. Together, it looks painful.</p>
<p>Outside of possible legal issues, I don&#8217;t understand why companies don&#8217;t let acquired brands stand on their own (especially strong brands). Nobody says, &#8220;Adobe Flash&#8221; or &#8220;FedEx Kinkos&#8221;. I chalk it up to insecurity (or dimwits in an echo chamber).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<a href="http://world-secure-channel.com/why/?partner=5"><small>Vpn service</small></a>
<a href="http://evterpa.co.uk/"><small>Mp3 fiesta</small></a>

<a href="http://mp3sparks.us/?p=13">All of mp3</a>